| In years past, the only concern with an industrial | | | | waterless cleaner is the sensible choice. |
| cleaner was whether or not it performed properly. | | | | Fully Evaporative, Leaving no Residue |
| But today, EPA regulations mean that many | | | | Like solvents that contain water, solvents that leave |
| companies must find cleaners that are | | | | residues can prove fatal to the lifespan of certain |
| environmentally safer than traditional cleaners. | | | | machine parts, particularly those that work in tandem |
| Because EPA regulations regularly lead to the | | | | with other parts. Furthermore, New Solvent II's |
| cancellation of hazardous solvents, companies are | | | | evaporative quality means that slippery residues that |
| wise to search for an alternative to their traditional | | | | could lead to workplace injuries and lawsuits will never |
| parts cleaners before legislation puts them in the | | | | be left on work floors. By purchasing a parts cleaner |
| position of immediately finding a new solvent that | | | | that leaves no residue, you can protect your |
| performs as well as the old one. To avoid this | | | | machines, your workers and your company's finances |
| situation, more companies are switching the | | | | at the same time. |
| environmentally preferred parts cleaner, Solvent New | | | | Contains no Hazardous Ingredients as Defined by the |
| II, officially known as MIL-PRF 680 Type II | | | | EPA |
| Degreaser Cleaner for Solvent Parts Washers. Below, | | | | Choosing a solvent that contains no hazardous |
| we list three advantages that Solvent New II has | | | | ingredients according to the EPA is key to choosing a |
| over traditional parts cleaners. | | | | solvent that won't be discontinued due to EPA |
| Contains No Water | | | | regulations. But choosing a non-hazardous solvent can |
| Solvent New II contains no water and is used | | | | also protect companies financially. Every year, |
| undiluted, making it ideal for cleaning electrical | | | | numerous lawsuits are brought against companies by |
| apparatuses. Traditional parts cleaners that contain | | | | workers claiming ill health due to toxic exposure, with |
| water have a reputation for leaking into electrical | | | | many of them being successful in court and costing |
| housing and causing components to rust form the | | | | their former company millions of dollars in settlements |
| inside out. But waterless Solvent New II remains on | | | | or jury awards. To protect your workers from toxic |
| the outside of electrical housing, lengthening the life | | | | exposure your company from paying out large sums |
| of the electrical components that it cleans. Because | | | | of money, using solvents that contain no hazardous |
| the purpose of maintaining electrical components is to | | | | ingredients according to EPA regulations is safest |
| lengthen their life as much as possible, choosing a | | | | choice. |